Patient Radiation Exposure During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction at the Philippine Heart Center

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare:

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit to start a request.

For author reprints, please email
Information image
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating

Published online:

Correspondence Details:Emily Mae L Yap, Invasive Cardiology Division, Department of Adult Cardiology, Philippine Heart Center, East Avenue, Quezon City, the Philippines. E:

Open Access:

This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.

Background: Emergency procedures, such as primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of acute ST-elevation MI (STEMI), may entail longer procedural times which translate to higher radiation exposure. In an effort to further improve radiation safety practices, the determination of the diagnostic reference level (DRL) for these procedures may allow the identification of practices which may predispose patients and operators to the undesirable effects of radiation.

Aim: This study aims to determine the radiation doses of the patients who underwent primary PCI in the setting of STEMI and to set the DRL for this procedure in our cardiac catheterisation laboratory.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Philippine Heart Center (PHC) on all patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI from 1 May 2019 to 29 February 2020. The DRL was established based on the third quartile values of the median dose area products.

Results: There were 663 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI, with a mean age of 55.75 ± 11.45 years. There were significantly more patients who underwent primary PCI using the transradial approach (395, 59.58%) compared to the transfemoral approach (268, 40.42%; p<0.001). For both approaches, the median fluoroscopy time was 11.05 minutes (7.23–16.38). The median cumulative air kerma was 496.46 mGy (330.95–842.8). The median total DAP was 4.22 mGy.m2 (interquartile ratio 2.78–6.55) and the DRL was 6.55 mGy.m2. A significantly higher DRL was seen when the femoral access was used (6.74 versus 6.50, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Higher radiation exposure can occur during emergency procedures compared to elective cases. Compared to the established DRL for elective ad hoc PCI in other countries, we report a higher local DRL, highlighting the need to reduce radiation exposure to as low as reasonably achievable for the operators.

Clinical and Procedural Characteristics of Patients

Article image

Radiation Doses During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Article image